Is 220 a prime number?
It is possible to find out using mathematical methods whether a given integer is a prime number or not.
For 220, the answer is: No, 220 is not a prime number.
The list of all positive divisors (i.e., the list of all integers that divide 220) is as follows: 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 20, 22, 44, 55, 110, 220.
For 220 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 220 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Find out more:
Actually, one can immediately see that 220 cannot be prime, because 5 is one of its divisors: indeed, a number ending with 0 or 5 has necessarily 5 among its divisors. The last digit of 220 is 0, so it is divisible by 5 and is therefore not prime.
As a consequence:
- 220 is a multiple of 1
- 220 is a multiple of 2
- 220 is a multiple of 4
- 220 is a multiple of 5
- 220 is a multiple of 10
- 220 is a multiple of 11
- 220 is a multiple of 20
- 220 is a multiple of 22
- 220 is a multiple of 44
- 220 is a multiple of 55
- 220 is a multiple of 110
For 220 to be a prime number, it would have been required that 220 has only two divisors, i.e., itself and 1.
Is 220 a deficient number?
No, 220 is not a deficient number: to be deficient, 220 should have been such that 220 is larger than the sum of its proper divisors, i.e., the divisors of 220 without 220 itself (that is 1 + 2 + 4 + 5 + 10 + 11 + 20 + 22 + 44 + 55 + 110 = 284).
In fact, 220 is an abundant number; 220 is strictly smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (that is 1 + 2 + 4 + 5 + 10 + 11 + 20 + 22 + 44 + 55 + 110 = 284). The smallest abundant number is 12.